Workshop on the Certification of Personal Protective Technologies
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Room 100
Keck Center of the National Academies
500 5th Street, NW
Washington, DC
8:00 - 8:10 a.m. Welcome and Opening Remarks
Howard Cohen, Chair, IOM Committee on the Certification of
Personal Protective Technologies
8:10 - 8:30 Overview and Terminology
Gordon Gillerman, National Institute of Standards and Technology
8:30 – 9:30 Session 1: Current Certification Efforts in PPT: Fire Fighter Ensembles
Facilitator: Roger Barker
8:30 – 8:40 Overview of the process, Roger Barker
8:40 – 8:50 Richard Duffy, International Association of Fire Fighters
8:50 – 9:00 Diane Haithcock, Underwriters Laboratories
9:00 – 9:10 Eric Beck, MSA
9:10 – 9:30 Discussion with the committee
Questions:
• Overview of the conformity assessment process for fire fighter protective equipment—who sets the standards, what products or materials are tested, who does the testing, who accredits the testing labs, who provides the certification?
• IAFF: Why was this process developed? What is or should be the role of government in the certification process? What factors were considered in establishing the process as a third-party testing process?
• UL: What is the typical timeline? What is the typical fee structure? What is the duration of validity of the certification? What post-marketing surveillance activities are conducted? What production oversight procedures are in place? How are mislabeling or other false assertions of certification addressed?
• Manufacturer: What are the incentives or barriers to assessing and asserting conformity?
• All: What are the challenges regarding innovation, interfaces between PPE components, etc? What needs to be done to improve the conformity assessment process? What is the value is added by having a conformity assessment/certification process in place? Are data available on how certification of fire fighter ensembles impacts fire fighter safety and health?
9:30 – 11:00 Session 2: Current Conformity Assessment Efforts: Other Products
Facilitator: Melissa McDiarmid
9:30 – 9:45 Body Armor Safety Initiative
Lance Miller, National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center
9:45 – 10:00 EPA Noise Reduction Rating Program
Ken Feith, Environmental Protection Agency
10:00 – 10:15 Consumer Product Safety
Gib Mullan, Consumer Product Safety Commission
10:15 – 10:30 CBRN Ensembles for Law Enforcement
Debra Stoe, National Institute of Justice (invited)
10:30 – 11:00 Discussion with the committee
Questions:
• Overview of the certification/conformity assessment processes—who sets standards, who tests, who accredits, who provides the certification? What value is added by having a conformity assessment/certification process in place?
• What is the role of government in the process? How were decisions made regarding the role of government?
• What is the typical fee structure?
• What is the duration of validity of the certification? What production oversight procedures are in place? What post-marketing surveillance activities are conducted? How are mislabeling or other errors in assertions of conformity assessment addressed?
• What are the challenges regarding innovation? What are the incentives or barriers to assessing and asserting conformity? What needs to be done to improve the conformity assessment process? Are data available on how certification impacts worker or consumer safety?
11:00 – 11:45 Session 3: Measuring the Impact of Certification on Worker Safety and Health
Facilitator: Barbara Burgel
11:00 – 11:15 Patricia Gleason, Safety Equipment Institute
11:15 – 11:30 Preston Anderson, Sperian Fall Protection
11:30 – 11:45 Discussion with the committee
Questions:
• How do standards and conformity assessment/certification impact worker safety? What data are available?
• What value is added by having a certification/conformity assessment process in place?
11:45 – 12:30 p.m. Lunch
Keck Atrium Cafeteria (3rd floor) or nearby restaurants
Speakers and committee members have blue lunch tickets in the pockets of their nametags (please sign and provide to the cashier)
12:30 – 1:45 Session 4: Incentives and Barriers to Conformity Assessment and Certification
Facilitator: Jim Johnson
12:30 – 12:45 Ginny Fitzner, Directorate of Standards and Guidance, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Kevin Robinson, Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories Program, OSHA
12:45 – 12:55 Louise Kuhny, Joint Commisssion (via phone)
12:55 – 1:05 Robin Scott, Sport Dimension
1:05 – 1:15 Dan Shipp, International Safety Equipment Association
1:15 – 1:45 Discussion with the committee
Questions:
• What drives the need for conformity assessment/certification? For government? For manufacturers? For consumers? How is the balance determined between being overly prescriptive and under prescriptive?
• OSHA and Joint Commission: What issues do regulatory or accrediting organizations consider in stipulating the need for products to meet specific standards or certification requirements?
• Joint Commission: What is the value of certification in terms of patient safety and worker safety? Does the Joint Commission provide feedback or incentive to healthcare facilities that choose to purchase certified equipment? Does the Joint Commission have any PPE standards related to health care worker safety?
• Manufacturers: What are the relative costs of various certification mechanisms to the final product and what are the differences in manufacturing to meet different certification requirements globally?
• Manufacturers: How does a manufacturer decide if it is worth investing in third party testing or certification or if a new product is worth bringing to market if certification is required?
1:45 – 2:45 Session 5: Risk-Based Approaches to Conformity Assessment
Facilitator: Anugrah Shaw
1:45 – 2:00 Gordon Gillerman, National Institute of Standards and Technology
2:00 – 2:15 Markham Luke, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health
2:15 – 2:45 Discussion
Questions:
• What risk-based approaches have been used to develop current conformity assessment processes?
• Should the development of a conformity assessment process take into account the effectiveness of recalls in the product category or consider the likelihood that the user can effectively determine the quality and suitability of the product for the intended use?
• What current process is used at FDA to assess the level of risk of a medical device and make determinations about the device class and whether the 510K process is required? Are medical device determinations predominantly based on risk to the patient or the healthcare worker or both? What are the current post-marketing surveillance efforts for device safety? Are any medical devices required to go through third-party testing prior to FDA clearance? How are devices (e.g., gowns) regulated that are sold without having gone through the FDA medical device clearance process?
2:45 – 4:15 Session 6: Panel Discussion: Case Study – Healthcare Worker Gloves
Facilitator: Alex Isakov
2:45 – 3:00 Terrell Cunningham, Food and Drug Administration
3:00 – 3:15 Michael Zedalis, Ansell
3:15 – 3:30 David Hermann, Aspen Healthcare Metrics
3:30 – 3:45 Sharon Welbel, Cook County Health and Hospitals System
3:45 – 4:15 Discussion with the committee
Questions:
• What is the current FDA process and what standards are required to be met for FDA 510(k) clearance?
• Should a more in depth conformity assessment process be implemented for gloves used in health care? If so, what type of process? If not, why?
• Are there adequate performance standards in place to test various types of gloves to see if they would meet certification requirements? If not, what’s needed?
• What are the reasons why third-party testing and certification efforts have not been developed to date?
• What incentives and barriers would there be for implementing a more in depth certification/conformity assessment process?
• What risk-based approaches could be used to determine the type of conformity assessment processes needed for the various types of gloves?
• What factors go into the decision to purchase? Would a third-party certification process make a difference in purchasing decisions?
4:15 – 5:00 Public Comment – Registered Speakers (3 minutes per speaker)
Moderator, Howard Cohen
5:00 p.m. Adjourn
Back to Meeting